Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
AJPM Focus ; : 100110, 2023 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322132

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To examine caregiver's perception of their child falling behind on developmental milestones after canceled or delayed appointments in metropolitan Chicago during stay-at-home orders, from March 21-May 7, 2020. Methods: We fielded a web-based caregiver survey to understand the impact of the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's health care experiences characterizing proportions of caregiver perceptions of children falling behind in developmental milestones by canceled or delayed appointment types. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of falling behind in milestones . Results: Overall, 229 (7.5%) caregivers reported children with canceled or delayed appointments falling behind in developmental milestones. Approximately 25.4% of caregivers reported children falling behind on milestones in the Missed Therapeutic group, compared with the Other Missed group (2.9%) (p<0.001). Children in the Missed Therapeutic group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 10.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.60-14.0)) and caregivers who experienced job loss (aOR 1.59, CI 1.11-2.28) or reduced hours or pay (aOR 1.90, CI 1.28-2.82) had higher odds of falling behind on developmental milestones. Conclusions: Implementation of new strategies to address the social needs of families should be develop when disruptions in developmental or therapeutic services among children occurs, particularly among children living in households with job insecurity.

2.
Pediatrics ; 151(6)2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315283

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of distinct message types in promoting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination intentions for parents of children and adolescents. METHODS: We collected data through the Voices of Child Health in Chicago Parent Panel Survey from October to November 2021. Parents were randomly assigned to read 1 of 4 vaccine message types and then report their intentions to vaccinate each COVID-19-unvaccinated child (0-17 years) in their household (n = 1453). RESULTS: The sample included 898 parents. Compared with a control group (37.5%), the proportion of parents who were very likely to vaccinate their children was higher when messages highlighted that other trusted parents have vaccinated their children (53.3%) or that the vaccine is safe and thoroughly tested (48.9%) but not when messages highlighted that the vaccine is well-tolerated (41.5%). After adjusting for parent and child characteristics, the odds of being very likely to vaccinate remained higher in the trusted parents group but not in the safe/thoroughly tested group. Unlike the control and well-tolerated groups, there were no racial/ethnic disparities in the unadjusted proportion of parents who were very likely to vaccinate in the trusted parents and safe/thoroughly tested groups. Message types affected the unadjusted proportion of COVID-19-unvaccinated parents who were very likely to vaccinate their children. CONCLUSIONS: Messages that focus on trusted parents choosing to vaccinate their children were more effective at promoting parents' COVID-19 vaccination intentions for their children than alternative messages. These findings have implications for public health messaging and pediatric providers' communications with parents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Chicago , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Intention , Parents , Vaccination
3.
Pediatrics ; 150(6)2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2116496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increasing suicide rates and emergency department (ED) mental health visits reflect deteriorating mental health among American youth. This population-based study analyzes trends in ED visits for suicidal ideation (SI) before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We analyzed Illinois hospital administrative data for ED visits coded for SI from January 2016 to June 2021 for youth aged 5 to 19 years. We characterized trends in patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, comparing three equal 22 month periods and analyzed patient and hospital characteristics associated with the likelihood of hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 81 051 ED visits coded for SI at 205 Illinois hospitals; 24.6% resulted in hospitalization. SI visits accounted for $785 million in charges and 145 160 hospital days over 66 months. ED SI visits increased 59% from 2016 through 2017 to 2019 through 2021, with a corresponding increase from 34.6% to 44.3% of SI principal diagnosis visits (both P < .001). Hospitalizations increased 57% between prepandemic fall 2019 and fall 2020 (P = .003). After controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, youth were 84% less likely to be hospitalized if SI was their principal diagnosis and were more likely hospitalized if coded for severe mental illness, substance use, anxiety, or depression, or had ED visits to children's or behavioral health hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents child ED SI visits in Illinois spiked in 2019, with an additional surge in hospitalizations during the pandemic. Rapidly rising hospital use may reflect worsening mental illness and continued difficulty in accessing low cost, high-quality outpatient mental health services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Suicidal Ideation , Child , Adolescent , United States , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Illinois/epidemiology
4.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1662, 2021 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477395

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare hesitancy toward a future COVID-19 vaccine for children of various sociodemographic groups in a major metropolitan area, and to understand how parents obtain information about COVID-19. METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey of parents with children < 18 years old in Chicago and Cook County, Illinois, in June 2020. We used logistic regression to determine the odds of parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (VH) for racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, controlling for sociodemographic factors and the sources where parents obtain information regarding COVID-19. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 1702 parents and 1425 were included in analyses. Overall, 33% of parents reported VH for their child. COVID-19 VH was higher among non-Hispanic Black parents compared with non-Hispanic White parents (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.65, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): (1.99-3.53), parents of publicly insured children compared with privately insured (OR 1.93, (1.53-2.42)) and among lower income groups. Parents receive information about COVID-19 from a variety of sources, and those who report using family, internet and health care providers as information sources (compared to those who don't use each respective source) had lower odds of COVID-19 VH for their children. CONCLUSIONS: The highest rates of hesitancy toward a future COVID-19 vaccine were found in demographic groups that have been the most severely affected by the pandemic. These groups may require targeted outreach efforts from trusted sources of information in order to promote equitable uptake of a future COVID-19 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Parents , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Pediatrics ; 146(1)2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1456130

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: More than 4 decades of research indicate that parenting interventions are effective at preventing and treating mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatric primary care is a viable setting for delivery of these interventions. OBJECTIVE: Previous meta-analyses have shown that behavioral interventions in primary care can improve clinical outcomes, but few reviews have been focused specifically on the implementation of parenting interventions in primary care. We aimed to fill this gap. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed 6532 unique peer-reviewed articles published in PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if at least part of the intervention was delivered in or through primary care; parenting was targeted; and child-specific mental, emotional, and behavioral health outcomes were reported. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were reviewed in Covidence by 2 trained coders, with a third coder arbitrating discrepancies. RESULTS: In our review of 40 studies, most studies were coded as a primary. Few researchers collected implementation outcomes, particularly those at the service delivery system level. LIMITATIONS: Including only published articles could have resulted in underrepresentation of implementation-related data. CONCLUSIONS: Parenting interventions delivered and implemented with fidelity in pediatric primary care could result in positive and equitable impacts on mental, emotional, and behavioral health outcomes for both parents and their children. Future research on the implementation strategies that can support adoption and sustained delivery of parenting interventions in primary care is needed if the field is to achieve population-level impact.


Subject(s)
Neurodevelopmental Disorders/therapy , Parenting , Parents/psychology , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Child , Humans , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/psychology
7.
Pediatrics ; 146(4)2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-680619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the coronavirus disease pandemic spread across the United States and protective measures to mitigate its impact were enacted, parents and children experienced widespread disruptions in daily life. Our objective with this national survey was to determine how the pandemic and mitigation efforts affected the physical and emotional well-being of parents and children in the United States through early June 2020. METHODS: In June 2020, we conducted a national survey of parents with children age <18 to measure changes in health status, insurance status, food security, use of public food assistance resources, child care, and use of health care services since the pandemic began. RESULTS: Since March 2020, 27% of parents reported worsening mental health for themselves, and 14% reported worsening behavioral health for their children. The proportion of families with moderate or severe food insecurity increased from 6% before March 2020 to 8% after, employer-sponsored insurance coverage of children decreased from 63% to 60%, and 24% of parents reported a loss of regular child care. Worsening mental health for parents occurred alongside worsening behavioral health for children in nearly 1 in 10 families, among whom 48% reported loss of regular child care, 16% reported change in insurance status, and 11% reported worsening food security. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus disease pandemic has had a substantial tandem impact on parents and children in the United States. As policy makers consider additional measures to mitigate the health and economic effects of the pandemic, they should consider the unique needs of families with children.


Subject(s)
Child Health , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Mental Health , Parents/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Child , Child Care/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Food Supply , Health Policy , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Male , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Public Assistance , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL